![]() In order to parse the models the helper relies on the doctrine/dbal package. Model helperįor the warnings regarding the Eloquent models we need to use another helper. Preferably use dependency injection instead. But please only use them for cross cutting concerns. When you ⌘ + click the method you end up in the helper, but there you can click on the non static method to see the underlying code (so navigation is supported OK-ish).įor convenience in Laravel, some non-static methods can be called statically (through so-called facades). It no longer shows a warning (inspection is now satisfied). Now the IDE knows the static Log::info() method. Then we can generate the general helper file. So what can we do to get rid of these warnings? Laravel IDE helperįortunately Barry van den Heuvel already built a helper to fix those issues. If you right click on the file and select “Inspect code…” PhpStorm presents a list of the warnings. ![]() This is even more helpful for classes that do not fit on a screen.īTW: I prefer using the explicit facades over the aliases (I’m not using the explicit facade for “App” here, I will explain the reason for that later on). You can see the colour-coded level of the worst warning in the upper right corner. For this the IDE is building an internal model of the code using static code analysis. They are caused by the inspections in PhpStorm. So let’s take a look at an exemplary Laravel controller. In this article, I’ll show you how you can leverage the power of the PhpStorm inspections for your Laravel projects. The inspections of PhpStorm are being improved with every new release. If I manage to get all inspections on a file to pass, I see a lot of issues right away. Otherwise I would be prone to the “broken window theory”. Therefore I’d like to keep all inspections “green”. (The most proper/recommended/cross-IDE-safe way IMO) Define such fields in advance using syntax - code completion will be available.I’d like to see potential issues in my projects right away by looking at the source code. Such unknown fields still will be highlighted, but with lower severity/not-so-visible (not an error/warning, just notice).ģ. This will be applied to whole project (Unless you define custom scopes and configure this inspection differently for each scope). Relax inspection a bit ( still no code completion for such fields) - Settings | Inspections | PHP | Undefined | Undefined field -> Downgrade severity if _magic methods are present in class No code suggestion (code completion) for such dynamic fields will be available.Ģ. The idea is - unknown fields on variables of stdClass will not be marked as undefined (no warnings). Your particular example (line 53): /** stdClass|News $article */ ![]() Manually declare such variable as instance of stdClass. How should I know for sure if that is indeed valid field and not some typo? Same for PhpStorm.ġ. It is not "false flagging" - you are expecting PhpStorm to discover your dynamic fields (created at runtime) and issue no warning. Don't think there'd be a quick fix for that though. The only thing that's not working correctly is absence of suggestions and false flagging when using the classes like this here on line 54 (the title, url_title, etc, properties). Well - whatever - as long as it works and you are happy. instead of properly inserting use Laravel\URI line where such class will be used (as required per namespaces specs), you just by-passing it by declaring some fake classes. but the actual code of app does not use namespaces (have not digged into it much - but somehow it finds correct classes during runtime). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |